Data sourced from Dakota Private Markets, the private fund performance platform powered by Dakota. Learn More | Request Access
Dakota Private Markets links 19,000+ funds with named performance data to the 20,000+ GPs that raised them. That linkage matters because a GP’s current fundraise is one data point. The story sits in the sequence: how Fund I performed, whether Fund III held the line, and whether Fund V is tracking above or below the peers it was raised against.
This post covers why a blended track record hides the trend, how to trace a series fund by fund, and what to check before you draw a conclusion.
Why a Blended Track Record Hides the Trend
A composite figure averages every fund a GP has raised into one number. A strong early fund can carry a weaker recent one, and a recent step-up can be buried by older vintages. Neither pattern is visible until each fund is viewed on its own.
Looking at the full series answers the question that actually drives a decision: has performance improved, held steady, or declined as the GP scaled?
How to Trace a Track Record, Step by Step
1. Start with the GP, not the fund. Pull the GP and view every fund it has raised, from Fund I through the current raise. This gives you the full series in one view instead of a single fund pulled out of context.
2. Benchmark each fund against its own vintage. A 2012 fund and a 2021 fund were raised into different markets, so they should not share a peer group. Dakota Private Markets assigns vintage-specific peer groups per fund, so each fund is judged against the managers that raised capital in the same year and strategy.
3. Compare relative performance, not just absolute returns. The question is where each fund ranked against its peers, and whether that rank moved up or down from one fund to the next. A fund that returned less in absolute terms can still be the stronger result if it launched into a harder vintage.
4. Read the direction of the series. Look for the trend across funds before the level of any single one. Three funds in a row moving up the peer ranking tells a different story than one outlier surrounded by flat results. A rising rank is worth checking against changes in team, strategy, or fund size, while a falling rank in recent funds is worth checking against how fast fund size grew relative to deal flow.
Want to run this on a GP you’re tracking? Dakota Private Markets shows every fund in a GP’s series against its own vintage-specific peer group. Request access to see the Fund I to current view on live, named fund data.
Who Uses a Series View, and Why
Allocators use it to underwrite a re-up or a new manager. Investment firms use it to benchmark a direct competitor’s history, or to see how their own series reads from the outside before the next raise.
The Dataset Behind It
The track record view runs on the same connected dataset as every other Dakota Private Markets use case. It includes 164,000+ portfolio companies held across the funds, 1M+ private companies tracked in total, 26,000+ private company transactions with 2,000+ added every month, and 15,000+ documents such as consultant reviews, pension documents, and fund presentations. Daily industry news keeps fund, GP, and transaction records current, so a series view reflects the latest raise and not last quarter’s snapshot.
Dakota Private Markets covers 20,000+ GPs and 19,000+ funds with named performance data. Filter by fund strategy, vintage year, fund size, or GPs currently in market to find the series you want to trace.
Request access to Dakota Private Markets to run the Fund I to current view on live, named fund data.
