October 22, 2026

From Reporting to Intelligence: How Private Fund Benchmarks Can Transform Family Office and RIA Software

6:02

Database referenced is Dakota Marketplace, the global LP and GP intelligence platform trusted by thousands of investment professionals. Learn More | Book a Demo

Family offices held 21% of their portfolios in private equity in 2024, according to the UBS Global Family Office Report 2025. Among RIAs, nearly half now allocate 10% or more of AUM to private markets (KKR, 2025 RIA Survey). Those holdings sit inside wealth management software that can report a fund’s IRR to two decimal places. What most of that software can’t tell the user is whether the number is any good.

In this article, we’ll explain the difference between reporting private fund performance and interpreting it, walk through what a peer benchmark adds, and show how family office and RIA software platforms can build that context into their products.

The Difference Between Reporting and Intelligence

Traditional portfolio reporting answers what happened: capital committed, capital called, distributions received, current value and return. Private fund reporting typically centers on three metrics, and each one leaves a question open:

Net IRR measures the annualized return based on the timing and size of cash flows. It doesn’t tell you whether that return is strong for the fund’s vintage and strategy.
TVPI measures total value (distributed plus remaining) relative to paid-in capital. It doesn’t tell you how the multiple compares to similar funds.
DPI measures capital actually returned relative to paid-in capital. It doesn’t tell you whether distributions are ahead of or behind peers.

Each metric is useful on its own. None of them answers whether a fund performed well relative to comparable investments.

Why Raw Returns Mislead

Consider two private equity funds (illustrative example):

Fund A: 2017 vintage, 14% net IRR, 1.9x TVPI, 1.2x DPI
Fund B: 2021 vintage, 18% net IRR, 1.5x TVPI, 0.3x DPI

Fund B has the higher IRR. Fund A has returned four times as much capital relative to what investors put in. The two funds were raised in different markets and have had different amounts of time to mature, so comparing them directly tells the user very little.

The right question is how each fund ranks against its own peer group: funds of the same strategy and vintage year, measured on consistent dates.

Why Private Markets Need Their Own Benchmarks

Public equity investors compare results to an index. Private markets need the same reference point, but building one is harder:

Strategy matters. A private credit fund shouldn’t be judged against a venture fund.
Vintage matters. A 2016 buyout fund and a 2023 buyout fund are at different points in their life cycle.
Sector matters. A software-focused buyout fund and an industrials buyout fund can produce very different return profiles.
Methodology matters. Peer group rules, sample sizes and measurement dates all change the result.

With the right benchmark data, a family office or advisor can ask more useful questions. Is this fund top quartile for its vintage? Are our private credit managers competitive? Which holdings need a closer review?

Want to add private fund benchmarks to your platform? Dakota’s benchmarking data covers 18,000+ private funds and plugs into your existing software. Explore Benchmarking Partnerships

What Benchmarking Adds: A 15.2% IRR in Context

A family office reviews a 2020 vintage buyout fund in its reporting platform. The fund shows a 15.2% net IRR and a 1.8x TVPI. Now assume, for illustration, that the peer median for 2020 buyout funds is a 12.5% IRR and a 1.6x TVPI.

With that benchmark in place, the platform can show that the fund is 2.7 percentage points ahead of its peers on IRR and 0.2x ahead on TVPI. With enough comparable funds, it can also show a quartile or percentile rank. (Benchmark figures are hypothetical and do not represent actual Dakota data.)

Fund maturity, valuation practices and liquidity still matter, but the user starts from context instead of a number on its own.

Five Ways Benchmarks Change Wealth Management Software

Reports become decision tools. Performance appears next to the relevant peer group, so quarterly reviews lead somewhere.
Outliers surface faster. Funds trailing their peers get flagged for review before the next commitment decision.
Due diligence improves. A manager’s prior funds can be judged against vintage peers, not just on absolute returns.
Client conversations get easier. An advisor can say how a fund ranks, not just what it returned.
New products become possible. Benchmarking can anchor a premium analytics tier.

How Software Platforms Can Add Benchmarks Without Building Them

Most family office and RIA software providers are not in the business of collecting private fund returns. Dakota’s private fund benchmarking data covers 18,000+ private funds with net IRR, TVPI, DPI, RVPI and PME. Peer groups can be built by asset class, strategy, vintage, geography, fund size and sector.

Platforms can integrate that data through an API, an embedded Peer Group Builder, a white-label module or a dataset license. The platform keeps the customer relationship and the interface, and Dakota maintains the data underneath.

Bring Benchmarks Into Your Platform

Dakota’s research team maintains performance data on 18,000+ private funds, so your users get peer comparisons without your team building a database. Partners can offer: