Did you know that 65% of people's job titles change every year? That number is staggering, but if you’re an investment sales professional, it probably doesn't come as too much of a surprise to you. One of the hardest parts of any sales person’s job is calling on the right people and setting up meetings.
Your job is only made harder when you’re working with outdated data, showing people who have changed jobs, titles, and phone numbers since you last interacted with them.
A CRM is a powerful tool, but it’s only as good as the data within it. So, the question becomes, how do you best maintain your data?
You have a couple of options. Do you attempt to do it yourself, either building it into your sales team’s process or by hiring a database administrator? Or, do you outsource it by hiring a third party?
It all depends on the needs of your team.
Because Dakota is a database provider, we know the ins and outs of the space, and just how much time goes into ensuring everything is as updated as possible. But we know what you might be thinking: of course we’ll tell you that the best way forward is a third party, it’s what we do, after all. But that’s not the case; we know that not every company has the same size data, team, or budget.
In this article, we’ll break down the pros and cons of keeping your data in-house versus hiring an outside, third party to keep up with it for you.
By the end of this post, you’ll be able to decide which is best for your team, so that your data is as up to date as possible.
When it comes to third parties, you can go in a few different ways. You can get your data directly from an outside source (database subscription) and import it into your CRM or use an outsourced database administrator.
Next, we’ll dive into the pros and cons of third party data management.
This ultimately depends how specialized you and your company are.
If you’re looking for a broad amount of accounts and contacts, then a third party data source would be better.
If you’re more specialized in a specific channel, (RIA, Consultants, etc.) then updating data in-house, or subscribing to a smaller, more manageable database would be best because it’s more specific and constantly updated.
A good middle ground is subscribing to a database and employing an internal data team to maintain it, so that you are constantly being given a new set of data that is updated and accurate.
Written By: Gui Costin, Founder, CEO
Gui Costin is the Founder and CEO of Dakota.
How to Sync Your Google Calendar With Salesforce
March 23, 2022
Why Your Investment Sales Team is CRM-Resistant — And How to Change That
November 29, 2021
The 3 Types of Metrics That Will Drive CRM Adoption Across Your Investment Sales Team
October 06, 2021
In-house vs. Outsourced Data Management: Which is Right for You?
December 03, 2020
CRM vs. Institutional Investor Databases: Why You Need Both
November 19, 2020
925 West Lancaster Ave
Suite 220
Bryn Mawr, PA 19010
Tel: (610) 642-1481
© Dakota 2025 | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy